I’ve probably already lost the cynics and defeatists by the beginning of this second paragraph, but for everyone else, I’m betting the idea sounds at least vaguely attractive. Maybe it’s even what you thought schools were supposed to be doing. As I have been researching and writing a book on K-12 education this summer, however, I’ve been struck by how little weight is given to fulfillment and happiness as a desired outcome of our educational system – at least in the U.S. And this in spite of the fact that our children from ages 5 – 18 (and often starting earlier), spend nearly half their waking hours in educational institutions.
It matters greatly what we think the outcome of these many hours should be because how we define the outcomes determines the strategies, tactics, and measurements we will use to get there. If it is all about higher test scores, then guess what, our educational institutions will develop approaches aimed at producing good test takers. There are already plenty of people wailing about how No Child Left Behind has resulted in just such a situation. But most of the “solutions” don’t sound much better.
They are geared towards producing more college graduates – which will inevitably lead to kids excelling at getting into and out of college, but not necessarily significantly better off for having done it.
Or they are geared towards meeting the supposed skill set needs of a vocal set of large business leaders.
Or they are geared toward the mastery of a core set of knowledge – as if that isn’t likely to lead to more rote memorization and assessment for the sake of assessment.
There may be valuable forms of educational attainment contained in all of these solutions, but they have little to do with real achievement, much less fulfillment.
Trying to gauge whether schools have contributed in a meaningful way towards fulfillment, towards the type of happiness associated with “the good life,” as Aristotle put it, may seem messy, but it strikes me as increasingly possible. The research that Martin Seligman, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and others have done in the field of positive psychology suggest numerous approaches that might be tried if we have the collective will to test and implement them.
A focus on fulfillment also strikes me as increasingly necessary – particularly from the perspective of curing the ills of the U.S. educational system. If our goals is to reassert ourselves as leaders in educating our children, why are we acting like followers who are doggedly playing catch-up to the test scores and college graduation rates of other nations? Is it possible that as leaders we need to be thinking differently?
Don’t get me wrong: I value things like a college education and mathematical brilliance. We need people who are educated to a high level; we need people who can understand the intensely complex calculations that underlie so much of our current science. But more importantly, if we expect to achieve new heights, we need the people who do these things to love them, to be passionate about them, to see them as part of a fulfilling, happy, engaged life. We don’t need to be shoving them down the throat of every student who enters our educational system. That devalues both the outcome and the student.
I’d say we should focus instead on helping people find what will make their lives as fulfilling as possible, and then support them in excelling at it. Let’s figure out the best possible role the schools can play in achieving that outcome.
What do you think? Please comment, or if you have a “What if…” for schools, please Tweet it with the hashtag #whatifschools.
P.S. – If you are interested in transforming education, I encourage you to check out Shift Ed: A Call to Action for Transforming K-12 Education.
P.S.S. – Many thanks to the folks at the following sites for posting about Shift Ed:
Bolton Public Schools
2011-2012: Evaluating our Vision!
Stop Arguing and Transform Already!
Winthrop University Opening Address
Academically On Course: How Winthrop Students Earn University Degrees Sustainable for the Times
Creating Our Future
Shift Ed: A Call to Action for Transforming K-12 Education
Promoting Student Engagement
Shift Ed Calls for K-12 Transformation
David Houle Speaks at Roanoke County’s Administrative Retreat: Sponsored by IA!
Why transformation is the only path for K-12 education
I am an avid lifelong learner who writes and speaks frequently on the critical role of learning in our fast-changing world.